Comparing FPGA families Xilinx vs Altera
When it comes to Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), two manufacturers stand out: Xilinx and Altera. Both companies offer a wide range of FPGAs, from low-cost options to high-performance devices. In this post, we will compare the main features of Xilinx and Altera FPGAs, so you can choose the best option for your next project.
Price
Price is always a key factor when choosing any component, and FPGAs are no exception. Both Xilinx and Altera offer a range of FPGAs at different price points, so you can choose the one that fits your budget.
According to recent market research, the average price of Xilinx FPGAs is slightly higher than that of Altera FPGAs. However, Xilinx FPGAs are considered to be more power-efficient, which can lead to long-term cost savings.
Performance
Performance is another important consideration when selecting an FPGA. Both Xilinx and Altera offer FPGAs with high-performance features such as high-speed transceivers, large on-chip memory, and low-latency interfaces.
According to benchmark tests, Xilinx FPGAs tend to perform better than Altera FPGAs in terms of logic utilization, routing delay, and power efficiency. However, Altera FPGAs are known for their advanced signal processing capabilities, making them a great option for applications that require high-speed data processing.
Development Tools
The development tools provided by FPGA manufacturers are crucial for successful FPGA design. Both Xilinx and Altera offer a range of development tools, including software development kits, hardware development boards, and integrated design environments.
According to user reviews, Xilinx development tools are considered to be more user-friendly and intuitive than Altera's. However, Altera's tools are known to have better performance optimization features that can help you achieve better results in less time.
Availability
When you're working on an FPGA project, the availability of the FPGA you choose is critical. Both Xilinx and Altera offer a wide range of FPGAs that are readily available. However, in recent years, Xilinx has been facing supply chain issues, which have resulted in longer lead times for some of their FPGAs.
Altera, on the other hand, has been able to maintain a more stable supply chain, which can give you more confidence when selecting one of their FPGAs.
Conclusion
Both Xilinx and Altera offer excellent FPGAs with unique features and capabilities. Ultimately, the FPGA that's right for you will depend on your project's specific requirements and budget.
References: